|
Herbert Spencer
(1820-1903)
Born in Derby, England, Herbert Spencer was raised in an atmosphere of
religious dissent and staunch individualism. During his childhood and
adolescence, Spencer was influenced largely by the Quakers and the Unitarians
of the Derby Philosophical Society. His father and uncle also held strong
anti-clerical and anti-establishment views. Spencer was formally trained
as a civil engineer but soon began to be interested in the those intellectual
pursuits which we today might term the social
sciences. It was Spencer who first published a theory of evolution
and coined the term "survival of the fittest"--not Charles Darwin
as many people today assume. Spencer's early works, such as Social
Statics, or the Conditions Essential to Human Happiness, were concerned
with the notion of civil liberties and the progression of human rights
viewed through the lens of early evolutionary theory. Spencer's work was
therefore largely influenced by his ideas on the evolution of human beings'
physical body as well as their mind. In his largest work, A System
of Synthetic Philosophy, Spencer applies his evolutionary theory to
account for many aspects of human culture
and its development over time. For instance, human
nature, according to Spencer, is not contained within a group of essential
characteristics; instead, it is based upon an ever changing and evolving
set of social circumstances. Several of his volumes are included within
A System of Synthetic Philosophy, which discusses such topics as
biology, psychology,
sociology,
and ethics--all of which, Spencer believed, can be explained by appealing
to one unifying theory (that of evolution)--a prime example of nineteenth-century
reductionism.
|
|
Quotation
"And now, we have prepared ourselves, so far as may be, for understanding
primitive ideas. We have seen that a true interpretation of these must
be one which recognizes their naturalness under the conditions. The mind
of the savage, like the mind of the civilized, proceeds by classing objects
and relations with their likes in past experience. In the absence of adequate
mental power, there results simple and vague classings of objects by conspicuous
likenesses, and of actions by conspicuous likenesses; and hence come crude
notions, too simple and too few in their kinds, to represent the facts.
Further, these crude notions are inevitably inconsistent to an extreme
degree."
- from Herbert Spencer, The Principles of Sociology (1899)
|
|
Secondary Literature on Spencer and Religion
Eric J. Sharpe, Comparative Religion: A History, pp. 32-5. Open
Court Press, 1986.
Brian Morris, Anthropological Studies of Religion: An Introductory
Text. Chapter 3. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Walter H. Capps, Religious Studies: The Making of a Discipline,
pp. 74-8. Fortress Press, 1995.
Garry W. Trompf, "Spencer, Herbert," The Encyclopedia of
Religion, 2nd edition. vol. 13, pp. 8678-8679. Macmillan Reference
USA, 2005.
|