Friedrich Schleiermacher
(1768-1834)
Born in Breslau (the Germanized name for what is today the city of Wroclaw
in Poland; as of 1871, it was part of the German Empire), Friedrich Daniel
Ernst Schleiermacher was the son of a Prussian army chaplain, and is today
remembered as a influential Protestant theologian who devised a manner
to defend belief in God from the criticisms leveled by the skeptics of
his day. He was educated initially in schools administered by the Moravian
Church--a Reformation denomination that originated in the mid-fifteenth
century in ancient Bohemia and Moravia (what is today part of the Czech
Republic) that emphasized the role of piety,
or an inner experience of the Gospel's saving power, over dogma and the
so-called trappings of ritual and institution. Against his father's wishes,
Schleiermacher left a Moravian seminary in 1787 and, instead, moved to
the University of Halle, in east central Germany. Founded in 1694, the
University of Halle is considered to have been among the first so-called
modern universities in which religious orthodoxy and Church control over
the curriculum gave way to free rational inquiry. There, Schleiermacher
was thoroughly schooled in, among other topics, philosophy, especially
the work of influential Prussian philosopher, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804).
Kant is today among a very small group of deeply influential writers from
this period, remembered best for his attempts to bridge David
Hume's arguments in favor of empiricism (the position that sensory
experience is the basis of knowledge) with those of rationalism (the position
that the innate ideas, or "categories," of human reason, not
experience, are the basis of knowledge). In 1794 Schleiermacher was ordained,
then served as a hospital chaplain in Berlin, and went on to represent
the Romantic movement (a philosophically idealist
movement in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries) by writing
a number of important works that sought to defend religious faith
against the attacks of Enlightenment skepticism (prompted both by empiricism
and rationalism).
|
|
Quotation
"But if anyone should maintain that there might be Christian religious
experience in which the Being of God was not involved in such a manner,
i.e., experiences which contained absolutely no consciousness of God,
our proposition would certainly exclude him from the domain of that Christian
belief which we are going to describe.... [W]e assert that in every religious
affection ... the God-consciousness must be present and cannot be neutralized
by anything else, so that there can be no relation to Christ which does
not contain also a relation to God.... Just as there is always present
in Christian piety a relation to Christ in conjunction with the God-consciousness,
so in Judaism
there is always a relation to the Lawgiver, and in Mohammedanism
to the revelation given through the Prophet."
- from Friedrich Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith (1820-1)
|
|
Secondary Literature on Schleiermacher
Richard R. Niebuhr, "Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst,"
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7, pp. 316-319. Macmillan
Publishing Co., 1967.
B. A. Gerrish, A Prince of the Church: Schleiermacher and the Beginnings
of Modern Theology. Fortress Press, 1984.
Walter Capps, Religious Studies: The Making of a Discipline, pp.
13-18. Fortress Press, 1995.
James M. Brandt, "Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst," The
Encyclopedia of Protestantism, vol. 4, pp. 1656-1661.
B. A. Gerrish, "Schleiermacher, Friedrich," The Encyclopedia
of Religion, 2nd edition. vol. 12, pp. 8159-8167. Macmillan Reference
USA, 2005.
|