Rudolf Otto
(1869-1937)
Born in Piene, Germany, Rudolf Otto was one of the foremost German systematic
theologians of the late-nineteenth century. He was educated at the University
of Erlangen and the University of Göttingen in liberal theology
and history of the Bible. Although originally having planned on entering
the ministry, Otto's arrangements were forced to change due to staunch
resistance from the ultraconservative German Lutheran Church and their
hesitance to give him an appointment. Instead, Otto took a teaching position
at the University of Göttingen and began studying the work of Jakob
Friedrich Fries (1773-1843)--an influential German philosopher who worked
to rationalize Immanual Kant's philosophy. Otto was so taken with Fries
that he helped to begin a Neo-Fresian movement within his academic circle
and wrote one of his first books on the philosophy of Fries and Kant.
Otto is probably best known to scholars of religion for what is considered
by most to be his best work, The Idea of the Holy. In this book,
Otto contends that religion--or better put, religious experiences and
sentiments--is a phenomena
complete unto itself, or sui
generis. For this reason religion cannot be broken up, according
to Otto, into other types of phenomenon (this supposition has come under
scrutiny by modern scholars who disagree with Otto and instead use the
theory of reductionism
to provide insight into the nature of religion). Otto also thought that
religion was knowable a priori (or independent of [that is, prior
to] experience) and therefore its study comprises a completely different
sphere of knowledge from other academic disciplines. Assuming this religious
sentiment to be universal among human beings, Otto was also interested
in the history of religions and traveled to India in 1911-1912 to study
Sanskrit
and Hinduism.
It was through this journey that he began to struggle with the theological
problems of the presumed Christian
superiority in the face of his growing knowledge of what we now refer
to as the "world religions."
|
|
Quotation
"The reader is invited to direct his mind to a moment of deeply-felt
religious experience, as little as possible qualified by other forms of
consciousness. Whoever cannot do this, whoever knows no such moments in
his experience, is requested to read no farther; for it is not easy to
discuss questions of religious psychology with one who can recollect the
emotions of his adolescence, the discomforts of indigestion, or, say,
social feelings, but cannot recall any intrinsically religious feeling.
We do not blame such an one, when he tries for himself to advance as far
as he can with the help of such principles of explanation as he knows,
interpreting 'aesthetics' in terms of sensuous pleasure, and 'religion'
as a function of the gregarious instinct and social standards, or as something
more primitive still. But, the artist, who for his part has an intimate
personal knowledge of the distinctive element in the aesthetic experience,
will decline his theories with thanks, and the religious man will reject
them even more uncompromisingly."
- from Rudolf Otto, The Idea of the Holy (1917)
|
|
Secondary Literature on Otto and Religion
Eric J. Sharpe, Comparative Religion: A History, pp. 161-167. Open
Court Press, 1975.
Walter H. Capps, Religious Studies: The Making of a Discipline,
pp. 20-25. Fortress Press, 1995.
Jaques Waardenburg, Classical Approaches to the Study of Religion:
Aims, Methods and Theories of Research, pp. 432-459. Walter de Gruyter,
1999.
Gregory D. Alles, "Otto, Rudolf," The Encyclopedia of Religion,
2nd edition. vol. 10, pp. 6928-6931. Macmillan Reference USA, 2005.
|