Clifford GeertzBorn in 1926 and now retired from academia--though still a much published and often translated author--Clifford Geertz is among the best known and most influential U.S. anthropologists of the mid- to late-twentieth century. Geertz is known especially among scholars of religion for his often utilized definition of religion as, in his famous words, "a cultural system." Having obtained his Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1956--after serving in the US Navy during the last years of World War II--Geertz held academic positions at the University of California, Berkeley, University of Chicago, Oxford University, and Princeton University's prestigious Institute for Advanced Studies. His early studies of Javanese culture (Java is an island that is part of the Indonesian archipelago and which contains the country's capital, Jakarta), were followed by repeated fieldwork--now generally understood as a requirement for producing legitimate anthropological knowledge. Geertz spent time in such other places as Bali and Morocco, ensuring that his work has been particularly well known to some scholars of modern Islam. Unlike his anthropological predecessors who were intent on explaining the natural causes of elements of culture, Geertz is today associated with an anthropological tradition known as symbolic anthropology, which is concerned with studying the meaning (as opposed to either the origins or the causes) that beliefs, behaviors, institutions, and symbols have for the members of a culture--which is itself seen by those who follow Geertz as an elaborate, interconnected system of symbols. As such, Geertz is part of the hermeneutic and phenomenological traditions of scholarship--traditions with a long and still active history in the humanistic study of religion. That is, to study a culture adequately, one must understand fully the meaning that a system of symbols and actions have for a group of cultural actors; this understanding presupposes correct interpretation on the part of the observer. In a classic example Geertz borrowed from the British philosopher Gilbert Ryle (1900-1976), he cites an observer--inevitably disconnected from the "local knowledge" possessed by a group of cultural participants--witnessing what might be called a "wink." Yet, this observer is incapable of distinguishing a meaningless twitch from a sly wink from what could even be an elaborate parody of a wink (in which the secrecy sometimes communicated by a wink is undermined by being broadcast to the entire group). For those who possess this knowledge, this seemingly subtle body movement could mean anything from an attempt to lessen the bite of a criticism to a recognition that someone was "in on the joke," to a sexual advance. To understand the meaning of the wink--and therefore to understand the manner in which shared sets of interconnected ideas and symbols (that is, cultures) make our worlds inhabitable by making them meaningful and therefore sensible to us--required what Geertz famously described as "thick description" of culture's interconnected symbols and the changing contexts in which they operate. A merely "thin description" of the behavior known as "a wink" was therefore hardly sufficient to understand it. |
|
|
Major Works |
|
|
Quotation |
|
|
Select Web Resources on Geertz |
|
|
Secondary Literature on Geertz and Religion |
|
|
|
|