Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences The University of Alabama
Social Anthropology Anthropology 536 Spring 1997
NAME OF SCHOOL OF THOUGHT GOES HERE
YOUR NAME AND YOUR CLICKABLE EMAIL ADDRESS GOES HERE
INDEX
Identify and briefly characterize the defining positions of the approach in question.
Indicate, where possible, the theories, methodologies and scholars against which the approach in question may be considered a reaction. What problems are perceived to be better addressed by adopting this theoretical and/or methodological position?
Name and provide brief biographies of the principal scholars assoicated with the approach.
Identify and briefly characterize the seminal works of the approach (i.e., articles, books, monographs, serials, etc.)
Identify and define the principal concepts which constitute the intellectual building blocks of the approach. Discuss any ambiguities or competing definitions.
Describe the standards for research design adopted by the school under consideration. Discuss the methods, techniques,and models advanced.
Discuss how anthropological knowledge has been advanced by the work of this school.
Discuss the theoretical, methodolgoical and empirical problems and limitations of the approach identified by its critics. How have these criticisms been met?
This is the place for any commentary that does not sit well in any of the previous categories.
.
List (with hyperlinks) and describe any web sites you have found that are relevant to this school of thought.
Return to Anthropology 536
Return to M.D. Murphy's Page
Return to Anthropology Department Web Page